Ryan Hunter, VP of Marketing for Mobius portfolio company Newmerix, has started the Front Range CMO’s – a networking and professional organization for marketing executives in the front range. You can check out the group’s blog at www.frontrangecmos.com. The group’s first event is going to be on February 4^th down in Denver. You can email Ryan directly if you’d like to learn more. He’s got a great group of local marketing execs already signed up – should be a great event and long term a great resource for the Denver/Boulder marketing community.

From CES. The bit with Bono is particularly amusing!

Enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xr5w3X4R8b4

Ross and Dave sent this link over to me today.

Parody –  a strong sign of flattery.  Clearly Apple has marketing down – we could all take a lesson. . .

https://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/iProduct.gif

I have no idea why Fraser, CO (our adopted 2nd home) would want the tag-line "the icebox of the nation" given its focus on outdoor activity (its next to Winter Park, has a great fishing stream running through town and has miles and miles of back-country skiing, hiking and cycling trails).  But apparently that is indeed the case.  Fraser has been involved in  long legal battle with the city of International Falls, MN for rights to the coldest place in the US.  Yesterday, International Falls won out (it really is colder there!).

INTERNATIONAL FALLS, Minn. – International Falls is officially the "Icebox of the Nation."

The city on the Canadian border had been fighting the ski town of Fraser, Colo., for the legal right to the trademark. International Falls claimed victory when the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office sent the city attorney a certificate granting the community Reg. No. 3,375,139.

Here’s the full article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23096109/

I’ve sat through a few presentations by investment bankers recently on what it takes to go public (most recently at VC in the Rockies – see my post about the conference here).  I  thought I’d throw out some of my notes so you could see what I’m being told it takes to get public in the current market.  The VCIR panel I sat through included some thoughts on the state of the m&a market, so I’ll include those notes as well. Company ‘Requirements’: – Revenue: ‘Bigger the better’; minimum of $60m/year annualized (so $15m/quarter at the time of the IPO; however 60% of 04’ IPO’s were < $100m in revenue (up from only 30% in the depths of the market); this has been a very consistent metric across all of the bankers I’ve talked with. – Profitability: Companies should be at or near profitability prior to IPO; there was some debate across the people I talked with about whether this was a requirement – some people thought companies absolutely needed to be profitable, others gave a little bit (but not much) of wiggle room. – Funding Needs: Company needs to be fully funded – the money raised in the IPO should be expansion capital, not core operating (get to profitability) capital- Team/Execution: Company probably needs to have been around for 4+ years; management teams are coming under much closer scrutiny by investors (was not the case in the bubble)

M&A Trends: – Cash deals are at an almost all-time high (presumably driven by both low interest rates and acquiring companies belief that their stock was undervalued and therefore equity was too expensive; in addition, a lot of active acquirers in the tech space especially have large cash reserves) – Hostile deals are also at an all-time high (drive by cash availability as well as companies feeling that some targets are ripe for the picking with their depressed stock prices) – The IPO alternative is seen as a credible threat (the banker who presented at VCIR estimated that 2/3rds of m&a deals are now dual tracked – this number struck me as high, but even if the real number is ½ of that it’s still an impressive figure).

The overall feeling I get is that the IPO market is certainly available to quality companies, but that the scrutiny companies go through to get out is real. While the markets basically shut down for the sectors that I work in during 01’ and 02’ they’ve clearly come back since then (as have the m&a markets, which is the more likely exit for many of the companies that I work with). We’ll have to see what 2005 brings – 2004 saw 54 IPOs of tech companies – lets hope we’re on track to best that figure.

UPDATE TO ORIGINAL POST ThinkEquity Partners has sarted a blog – an excellent development for those of us who are excited about the potential of corporate blogging – and just posted their thoughts on the IPO market this year.  You can check it out at: http://www.thinkequity.com/mt-archive/2005/02/ipo_dashboard_f.html

I thought I should post this after making such a stink about data being plural and all.  Here’s a link to a little word test for those of you (like me) who are interested in seeing if you really have a clue about these things (turns out I have only a partial clue – I scored 93% on each of the beginner and intermediate, 100% on advanced and a paltry 66% on expert).

You can take the test here (the direct url in case the link doesn’t work is http://www.okcupid.com/tests/take?testid=14457200288064322170).

Thanks to Dave Jilk for sending this over to me.

Let me know how smart you are . . .

The New York Times is running a series of articles on the last days of the Enron crisis (actually excerpts from Times writer Kurt Eichenwald’s forthcoming book on the subject).   It reads like a soap opera (by both design and because that’s really what this story amounts to).  The amazing take-away for me was just how far Enron had strayed from the most basic forms of financial management (they didn’t track their cash balance, nor did they track when their debt came due – so they had no idea either what they owed or how much they had available to cover that debt).
Take a look at the article here (in case the link doesn’t work the url is http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/13/business/yourmoney/13enron.html?) .  It’s worth a read.

[see the bottom of this post for an invite code to a new service that helps solve the problem I’m describing here]

It’s probably passe to say that we live in an information economy.  It’s also probably not correct anymore because really we live in an information NOW economy.  Staying on top of the topics that are important to you and your company has never been more important.  And with the explosion of media sources (particularly on-line) this has never been more of a challenge. 

Back in the day, large companies would outsource the function of knowing what was said of them and their competitors to various "clipping services", so named because they would line up the major new outlets of the day (mostly the large daily newspapers and national magazines) and literally clip out the stores that were of interest to their clients with scissors.  Every week they’d compile these clippings into a briefing and ship it off to their client.  These services weren’t very efficient and they were extremely expensive, but there was little other choice.  While these services have evolved in more recent years to incorporate technology, they’re still expensive and for the most part involve some 3rd party culling through the data to sort for relevance. 

Google Alerts is the most notable exception here – they’ve developed a service that in theory will let you know when any particular key word (really any search string) is crawled by Google spiders.  However in my experience Google Alerts quickly falls down. For starters, I get relatively few hits across my keywords and most of the hits I get are repeat ones (I can’t understand this at all – with probably 60 keywords I get almost no alerts and while I share keywords with some of my colleagues I rarely am sent the same hits that they are). I have other friends with the opposite problem with Alerts – their inbox is flooded with responses.  In some cases so much so that they had to turn the service off completely.  There’s also no good way to aggregate these alerts into any kind of trend data or manipulate them, group them, etc. 

Enter Filtrbox.  Filtrbox was one of last year’s TechStars companies and the the one with which I worked most closely (after the summer TechStars program I participated in their angel financing round).  They’ve developed a system that if you had to describe it in a single sentence is "Google Alerts on steroids".  That said, it’s almost unfair to compare the two as Google Alerts just isn’t designed to provide users with the accuracy, level of coverage, ability to tune and provide feedback to alert terms and the overall representation of data that Filtrbox provides – even now in the relatively early version of the Filtrbox platform.  Filtrbox allows me to set up a series of "filtrs" that contain various keywords so that I can organize the things I’m looking to track.  Every morning I get a "daily briefing" email that lists all the hits from the last 24 hours and online I can use their dashboard to see up-to-date hits in list and graphical form, manipulate the data, adjust the sensitivity of the report (so I see fewer, but more directly relevant hits) and tune the system by providing it feedback on the information it provides me.  Below is a snapshot of their dashboard to give you a sense of what I see every day (in true Web 2.0 fashion, everything in the image below will give me more information as I mouse over it and I can adjust the data I’m seeing on the fly by checking and unchecking keywords or entire filtr groups or adjusting the sensitivity (the slider in the top center of the page).

The service is in private beta, but they’ve given me an invite code that I can use to let people try the system out.  For smaller users, the service will be free (you’re limited in the number of keywords you can use and by the length article history).  For larger users there will be paid "pro service" ($20/month) and for teams of users a group account that enables some additional sharing and other group related functions (for $100/month for the team).  You can sign up for the beta at https://www.filtrbox.com/signup.php?code=foundry.  If I’ve run out of invites, drop me a line and I’ll try to make more available. 

Entrepreneurship in the United States is changing pretty dramatically – in ways that many of us have failed to notice or understand. Specifically today’s American entrepreneurs are more likely to be female and non-white. In fact, the number of women-owned businesses has increased 31 times between 1972 and 2018 according to the Kauffman Foundation (in 1972, women-owned businesses accounted for just 4.6% of all firms; in 2018 that figure was 40%). Meanwhile, the fastest-growing group female entrepreneurs are women of color, who are responsible for 64% of the new women-owned businesses being created. There’s a lot more to dig into here, which I’ll do in future posts. But it’s urgent that we begin to understand this because we’re failing to build systems to support these new entrepreneurs. This has become especially clear in the current economic crisis, as I pointed out in this piece I wrote with Elizabeth Macbride a few weeks ago for CNBC as well as this post from last week. Relief money authorized by congress under various programs of the CARES Act and other initiatives is failing to reach many women and minority owned businesses and is highlighting structural issues with the way we support entrepreneurs in the United States. For example, it has been widely documented that women and minority owned businesses are not accessing aid through the Payroll Protection Program (PPP) – see for example, here, here, here, here, here. This program requires businesses to have relationships with certain approved SBA lenders, which women and minority owned businesses are less likely to have. Its initial roll-out excluded certain types of financial institutions (most notably CDFIs) which disproportionately bank these businesses. It also left much of the underwriting criteria up to the banks themselves, who favored other customers. And the program itself – based on W2 payroll and primarily benefiting businesses that were in a position to open up quickly – failed to address the kinds of businesses most likely to be started by this new generation of entrepreneurs.

We can and must do better.

Which is why I’d like to highlight for you a great program called EforAll.  Launched in 2013 with a mission of partnering with communities to help under-represented individuals successfully start and grow their businesses, EforAll is a pretty special organization. I’ve gotten to know them well over the past two years (Brad and his wife Amy, as well as Greeley and I are financial supporters of EforAll). EforAll combines immersive business training, mentorship and an extensive support network to help support their entrepreneurs. It’s incredibly compelling and urgently needed – now more than ever. EforAll is up and running in 9 communities in Massachusetts and Colorado and, to date, they’ve supported entrepreneurs in starting almost 350 businesses, 83% of which continue to be actively pursued by their founders. About a year ago we launched in Longmont and that program just graduated their first class (I attended the virtual demo day/graduation – it was inspiring).

We’ll be starting up another Longmont program this summer and are looking for mentors in Boulder and the Front Range (although potentially for this one anywhere – we anticipate much of this summer’s program will end up being virtual). This is a fantastic opportunity to help female, minority, and immigrant entrepreneurs pursue their business ideas.

A few stats:

EforAll National
– Over 500 ventures graduated
– Nearly $35M in capital raised
– Over $25M in 2019 revenue

EforAll Longmont
– 9 businesses (11 entrepreneurs) went through first Longmont accelerator
– Those entrepreneurs were from the North Metro area, Boulder County, and Weld County
– Ventures in the first program ranged from gluten-free beer & pastries being made from ancient grains & traditional Peruvian recipes, to a financial literacy app for elementary school students, to a husband & wife duo manufacturing adaptive underwear for individuals with sensory disabilities
– Highlights from the first accelerator include an entrepreneur securing her first two grocery store clients for her plant-based meat product, an entrepreneur raising 40k from friends and family, and an entrepreneur launching their first online marketplace for disability-focused products
– EforAll Longmont was also mentioned in this href=”https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/07/your-money/entrepreneurship-philanthropy-gururaj-deshpande.html”>New York Times article, received support from Google, and worked with more than 50 volunteers during our first accelerator (including about 30 mentors)

EforAll Mentoring Ask – Mentoring with EforAll is a fantastic way to support small businesses and aspiring entrepreneurs in your own background. Accelerator Mentors come from a variety of backgrounds and use their business and leadership experience to guide new entrepreneurs through the process of starting or growing a business. Mentors work in teams of three and are matched with an entrepreneur based on schedule availability and desire to work together. The team meets as a group to help reaffirm topics and themes raised during classes, while also strategizing with the entrepreneur on how to reach their specific goals during the program. Mentoring with EforAll is a 90-minute per-week commitment from July-September and all meetings between entrepreneurs and mentors will take place virtually. For more information, you can click here and you can also email EforAll Colorado Executive Director, Harris Rollinger, at harris@eforall.org.

I can’t state it more simply or directly than the title to this post – you should be coming to the Defrag conference (www.defragcon.com). 

Foundry started Defrag with conference veteran Eric Norlin to bring together a group of technologists to talk about the challenges around increasing fragmentation of data online and the tools and technologies that are being developed to make sense out of this data mess. We strongly believe that rather than sitting on the sideline watching and listening to the conversation taking place within the markets we care about that we should be actively facilitating and participating in that discussion (you’ll hear more about a new conference we’re working on withe Eric soon).

With industry thought leaders such as Esther Dyson, Doc Searls, Chris Shipley and many others, the conference is a hotbed of new ideas.  Most importantly the sessions are designed to stimulate debate, discussion and disagreement and the engagement level of the attendees is truly unique.  This is truly a "must not miss" event.

I’ve been to a lot of conferences over the years and think the most of them pretty much suck. They are too preachy, the attendees are too varied and numerous to enable meaningful interaction and they skim the trees in terms of content.  Defrag couldn’t be more different.  It is everything conferences should be – stimulating, engaging, meaningful and thought provoking. 

Register Now!

Special note to my Denver/Boulder readers: It’s not often that a world class technology conference sets up shop in our area. We specifically located Defrag in Denver to help encourage local entrepreneurs and companies to become even more a part of the conversation.  The conference brings world-class thought leaders to our hometown.  I’ve seen the registration data – the conference is attracting talented entrepreneurs from all around the country. But registrations from Denver/Boulder are lagging.  What gives? Represent for your local community. Take part in the national conversation.  Get to Defrag!