Posts By / seth levine

Zero. Zip. Nada.

The US personal savings rate fell to zero in June โ€“ its lowest level since the latest spending binge started (post 9/11) and the 2nd lowest since the Great Depression. You can read the full government report here (be sure to check out some of the tables โ€“ very interesting information).  Yes, the economy grew at a healthy annualized rate and clearly the Fed is still worried about inflationary pressure (we still have 50-100 basis points left to move in the fed funds rate) . But still โ€“ personal savings rate of 0%? We already lag behind the rest of the world in our ability not to spend pretty much all of what we earn (see here for a chartโ€ฆ

We still have a long way to go

Iโ€™m leaving for a weekโ€™s vacation tomorrow (see my vacation curve post โ€“ Iโ€™m past the inflection point again) and Iโ€™m not planning on checking my e-mail regularly.  To keep down on e-mail clutter, my secretary is going to monitor my mail and delete or move things out of my inbox that are not important or that donโ€™t have immediacy.  To make sure the right stuff stays and goes, Iโ€™m making a list of things that I would like her to keep and things that she can move or throw out.  This process has highlighted for me how many things I get delivered to my inbox that should be sent via RSS โ€“ all the updates, tech dailies, vc weeklies,โ€ฆ

More thoughts on Occamโ€™s Paradox

Iโ€™ve been re-reading my Occamโ€™s Paradox post as well as the comments and trackbacks (which are excellent โ€“ please click through them if you have a minute).  I fell a little short of really saying what I originally intended for the post, which was that I think that we have a tendency not only to make things more complicated than need be, but also to focus on too many things (and therefore the wrong ones).  As a result we try to assimilate too much data to make decisions (not recognizing the massive diminishing returns on this effort) and try to pay attention to too many things.  I wrote a post a while ago about trying to cram too much informationโ€ฆ

Occamโ€™s Paradox

Remember Occamโ€™s Razor? Itโ€™s the principle (that you probably learned in high school physics) that states that the simplest solution to a given problem is probably the best.  Iโ€™ve been thinking recently about complexity in business and in life and think thereโ€™s a corollary to Occamโ€™sRazor that perhaps should be called Occamโ€™s Paradox โ€“ the propensity of humans to make things more complicated than they need to be.  I donโ€™t pretend to know why this is, but I notice it all the time (both in my own life and with other people).  I guess itโ€™s just easy to start down the road of dependency mapping (i.e., making everything you do a part of a larger matrix that has many interdependencies). โ€ฆ

Cheese

Today is the 36th anniversary of the first moon landing (July 20, 1969).  Moonโ€™s almost full, so youโ€™ll get a great look at it. Google put up a moon site recently โ€“ www.moon.google.com.  Be sure to zoom all the way in <g>.

Who is your vc?

John H turned me on to a post from Investments and More titled VCโ€™s โ€“ Top Brass Solid, Others Not (โ€œwow โ€“ someone taking the glam out of the VC world,โ€ he writes).  I actually found his post pretty amusing. While I think a lot of people at venture firms are fantastic (law of natural selection, I guess) there are, of course, some that are better than others. What Steveโ€™s post did bring to mind was how important it is to recognize that when you take on an investor youโ€™re taking on an individual more than you are taking on a firm. Some firms have more cache than others, but at the end of the day as an entrepreneur youโ€ฆ

Changing styles . . .

Brent wrote in recently to remind me that I wrote in M&A Part I โ€“ Lines in the Sand that Iโ€™d talk a bit about changes in my negotiating style over time. I actually interested to hear if other people have had similar experiences, because what Iโ€™m about to describe both seems like a natural progression and might also be termed โ€˜growing upโ€™. I had an odd introduction to more formalized negotiation a few months into my first corporate job after leaving Wall Street. The company I worked for decided to embark on a few acquisitions and I was assigned to work on these with my boss who was the head of the business development group. Eventually we settled onโ€ฆ

Some thoughts on better board meetings

I sit through a lot of board meetings and while they are a great time for a company to harness the expertise of the people sitting around the table, they need to be structured and managed in such a way to actually accomplish that (i.e., effective board meetings donโ€™t just happen โ€“ they are the result of planning and careful management).  I sometimes joke with my dad that it must be tuff to get a word in at his board meetings given the powerhouses around the table; he just laughs and tells me that they prepare for their board meetings carefully.  In actuality, I think he get a huge benefit out of his board โ€“ as do many of theโ€ฆ

Toys

Hereโ€™s some stuff Iโ€™ve been playing with that Iโ€™ve been meaning to post about: First is MyBlogLog, which tracks links people follow from my blog site.  It also tells me how many page views were served from my site. Since I serve full feeds this doesnโ€™t capture all of my link traffic (I miss everything that isnโ€™t clicked directly from the site itself), but I get enough direct site hits to extrapolate these data to my subscriber base. If you want you can also put up a chicklet on your site that shows your most popular links.  Itโ€™s easy to set up (you have to embed a small amount of code on your site) and intuitive to use.  Some moreโ€ฆ

How cool is your ride?

Even though Iโ€™m getting older I still like to think of myself as at least a little bit cool (although Iโ€™m sure there are many people who would set me straight on that one).  As a result I was a bit dismayed this weekend to read an amusing article in the Times that clued me in that โ€“ at least in my choice of cars โ€“ I was not as cool as I thought I was.  In fact, the Land Rover that I drive is pretty close to the โ€œStodgyโ€ end of the cool meeter and in the same category as Chrysler and (gasp!) Oldsmobile.  As the kids would say these days: โ€œNot so groovy!โ€